science doesn't indefinitely say much about the nature of our universe - thats part of what makes it so agreeable. id like to see good qualified minds be sponsored to seriously investigate the potential "scientific reality" of spinny-hat claims
the problem is a pharmaceutical company will pay a higher salary to any team of researchers then a tibetan monestary will
to my understanding, an "enlightened" perspective claims that our experience is a re-organization of energy to isolate whats preferred, and otherwise, all in an attempt to better understand our own preference
in considering that our experience is energy organized in a particular fashion, it isnt outside of reason to also consider that energy as a whole acts under predictable universal laws. to me, when this notion is "applied scientifically", it suggests trying to introduce new quantifiable variables to old confirmed patterns, specifically; the potential gravitational effect of waves with density relative to particles, in their accumulation in space (and on earth and in the body)
but im just one ignorant person, and thats only one idea - im sure there could be many more and many better ones as people more generally respect the values of cultures outside their own.
http://binaryresearchinstitute.com/bri/introduction/
ReplyDeletehttps://theconversation.com/fragments-of-energy-not-waves-or-particles-may-be-the-fundamental-building-blocks-of-the-universe-150730?fbclid=IwAR0CRm9Y3bYmAHLDOXnmix_qc3IAE6-XduHuT7C8tpeiAj9apRkP9uufF5k
ReplyDelete