"Religion was born when the first con man met the first fool"

Religion was born when cultures of different values met, they needed a word to understand their differences.

Any institution that promotes peace and values is fine by me - to throw them all in the same basket labelled "religion" is a gross generalization akin to the crimes one group would commit to another on the basis of a difference in belief. Watch your tongue!

http://www.trueactivist.com/nestle-ceo-water-is-not-a-human-right-should-be-privatized/

Appropriation of availability, in terms of water, may be a paid for service yes - but no one man or corporation has the right to declare water his own property as it has always been available to all of us.

Water is NOT a finite resource, it remains forever glued to the earth - it may take different forms as it passes through phases of a cycle but in reality it is everywhere. To take a portion of water and say "this is mine now" would involve containing that water and stopping it from moving along it's route towards facilitating life in every form, essentially stealing the water from it's previous owners-at-large.

To contain water is to deny a natural function of the earth, which in turn threatens every industry built around natural resources - the capacity industrialization of said resources being an inherent human right, right? Peter Brabeck?

how embarrassed will I feel looking back on posts *wonders*

                           _| - Us
                         _| - ?
                      _| - ?
                   _| - ?
                 _| - sapiens
            __| - neanderthals
         _| - rhodesiensis
    __| - heidelbergensis
 _| - erectus

_| -habilis

Let's look at some odds, first, some numbers.
Genus:
Homo known variety: 25, living today, 1

Felidae known variety: 49~, living today, 41

Canis known variety: 52~, living today, 10

Aquila known variety: 30, living today, 16

"The odd's" are defined (and work against evolutionary theory) in a number of ways.

Firstly, we have an eco-system that has produced a mammal that will survive in any other ecology on earth.

Secondly, the rate of mutation is sporadic - at one point there are as many as 4-5 phenotype's of the human genus existing around the world but ultimately (and relatively suddenly) being reduced to just one.

Thirdly, throughout the whole duration of this story - walking upright without the use of fists is never selected in another instance of ape ever again. (unless you believe in Big-Foot).

"The odd's" come with the understanding : there have been nothing but homo-sapiens and dwindling neanderthals on earth for the past 200 thousand years, it's like a meteor hit earth to wipe out every other variety of human genus besides us. Evolution does not produce only one champion, and it does not stop.

WITHOUT EVIDENCE of our having evolved aside alternative stable morphological competitors, through fossils of alternative phenotypes, there is in turn the ASSUMPTION that a slew of unlikely events occurred (like the rape and assimilation of neanderthals) most importantly to me among them: that we evolved away from our ancestral family at an accelerated rate - but we know that evolution does not work that way and there has been no other evidence / instance of evolutionary selection to the same extreme degree for as long as there have been apes at least! it is just simply not the case that we should have developed in the same fashion. We are more likely to have come from somewhere other then the process of evolution.

This e-mail was sent to infohaarp@haarp.alaska.edu   on Feb 19th 2013. I'm eagerly awaiting a response.

I previously read (on www.haarp.alaska.edu)  that initially, the goal of the HAARP facility was to produce a tear in the ionosphere described as a "runaway effect". I can no longer find this (mission statement) on the website, rather, an "Environmental Impact Process" is described wherein experts first concluded that such research would not disturb the protective mechanism of our atmosphere...." there will be no impact produced by HAARP on the protective qualities of the earth's atmosphere. This was the conclusion of the environmental impact process, and the question was thoroughly studied by experts in the field prior to granting permission to proceed with the project."(http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/ion3.html)
When was the environmental impact process first sanctioned? Who were the experts consulted? 
Is there a department I can contact for more information?


I got a return message indicating their mailbox is full. "<infohaarp@haarp.alaska.edu>: cannot update mailbox /var/mail/infohaarp for
    user infohaarp. error writing message: File too large"

space is A capacity for dynamic balance of the energy that our universe consists of; time is its potential for change.

we know that time is vast like space because from this time (lets take 12:00 AM) to the point of the next hour (1:00 AM) you could be potentially in a wide variety of states, doing a multitude of different things. the potential variety of what you might be doing at the end of that hour is an orientation of where you are in the sea of possibility that is time. the relationship between these two components of reality is an effect of our conscious interaction with space - because we as sentient life have the ability to sustain ourselves through long periods of time we are able to in turn gain this perception of the universe's potential for change on a microcosmic level. I am personally more inclined to believe that the point of all this (the relationship between space and time) is to explore potential states of balance within ourselves given the boundaries that make up our reality, all to be appreciated on some macro-cosmic level within the same context as the mechanism that is space time.