for the record

Crime against humanity is the sort of description. Here we have a national institution that used its authority to recommend medical interventions for which there are no indications. Indictments should consider the scale and degree of injury caused by such ill-founded recommendations.

Real childhood illnesses have actually killed people and have been shown to be avoidable through vaccines. To lie to an expectant mother and tell her that the vaccine we are using is for a known and  preventable childhood illness WHEN IT IS NOT is a serious crime.

Hepatitis B is a blood borne illness that is spread by shared needle use (contaminated blood transfusion) and unprotected sex. The amount of saliva needed to confer the illness is very very large.
There is a way to test people for HepB antigens to see if they might have the disease so why wouldn't the CDC recommend people do that or recommend people thinking of getting pregnant do that. To  recommend that every person needs the product is malevolent and abhorrent.

There are other ways a company could extract money from people , malice is the only rational explanation . Motivated by de-population or eugenics, greed is not a sufficient or practical reason to risk harm to so many others, especially systematically to the most innocent population of all.

Trying to bring light to this has been an Orwellian nightmare.   In the first place, many people are all-together unaware that the medical establishment will acknowledge upfront that the whole show is a risky business, that some people will die because they turn out allergic to,  or can not effectively metabolize a vaccine  ,  but that more people might die of the disease the vaccine is meant for, if we don't give it to everybody.

Many of these people rightfully assume that if there was undue risk and people were dying unnecessarily  that some kind of  health authority would take notice, sound the alert,  and that they would have heard about it.      Posted below is a video proving Facebook secretly does not allow the dissemination of research that shows HepB vaccine might cause Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and that an international review is needed.

https://youtu.be/WAFZuLZEETE

Mark Zuckerberg said his company reduces the search relevancy of anti-vaccine rhetoric, but how many research articles are secretly being outright blocked? As the person posting, everything looked normal to me until out of paranoia I looked from another persons account to see that the comment linking peer-reviewed research is removed - but the rest of my postings are there.

It is my expectation that the gravity of this situation will inevitably catch up to our health authorities and they will have no other option besides recanting their stance on immunization in general. Trump's administration will probably be to blame but many will still wonder, how did so few notice and, why did they fail to alert the media? For the record: collective energy was spent in the thousands of hours for many years trying to bring light to this situation and it was very, very, very hard to communicate to others.  Through this experience I now truly appreciate the phrase "if it can happen in Germany".

futurist prediction

elite infighting will end authoritative support behind the debt banks lend, leading to a re-evaluation of true asset value. banks will be in the rather awkward position of assigning energy production values to things like farming and electrical power generation as well as associated assets (like factories  and resource processing).

banks will not seek proprietary ownership of total resource production but will instead offer cooperation to social groups who can effectively organize the mobilization of resources without any help.

cooperation with banks will come in the form of credit in a global market of recognized resource production based values. this will be the fundamental framework of a new era for civilization as it's timing is likely to relatively coincide with the advent of new technologies like qbit based processors and machine learning techniques.

a major problem I foresee is not the disenfranchisement of those with investments not recognized as valuable but a rather sudden lack of assurance that illegitimate authority will be recognized. That is, that because authority gained by conspiracy is not likely to hold the capacity for social organization, real leadership will suddenly be responsible for the direction of large groups of people where possible. This new state of transparent interests in leadership may be more dangerous than the potential anarchy it replaces.

Eventually people everywhere will organize into this global asset marketplace making the banks who originally credited using a new asset evaluation model the new global elite - for better or worse